|
IN THIS ISSUE:
Sustaining the Roots of a Green Economy

National
Coalition Calls for Investment in Working Lands
When President Obama talks about his
vision for a “green economy,” it can seem like a novel
concept, dependent on high-tech clean energy from the sun or
wind, or food transformed into fuel.
But green jobs mean something more
traditional for more than 3 million people who depend on
America’s working forest, farm and ranch lands for their
livelihoods. Many can trace the roots of our green economy
back through multiple generations of their family trees.
Productive, privately owned forests
have long been an economic mainstay of many communities.
Composing 60 percent of all U.S. forests, they provide wood
products, renewable energy and employment that allow
forest-related industries to funnel more than $100 billion
dollars into the U.S. economy annually.
The natural, working landscapes that
surround us make significant contributions to local, state,
regional and national economies, while providing clean air,
water, wildlife habitat and renewable biomass energy. Yet,
privately owned U.S. forests increasingly are threatened by
economic forces that drive owners to sell the land for
conversion to other uses. The majority of family-owned
forests will be sold and developed over the next 50 years,
according to recent USDA projections.
In that scenario, our iconic, forested
landscapes will look more like urban suburbs, their heritage
and economic contributions lost.
“This originally was a lumber-based
community,” recalls Gary Hendrix, spokesman for a
seventh-generation forest- and mill-owning family in Shasta
County, Calif. “Originally, there were 56 sawmills here—now
there are three. We had 10 full-time employees. Now we’re
down to two plus ourselves, just getting by with the bare
minimum. Rural communities like ours are really hurting.”
Times are hard in forest communities
all over the U.S.
The economic downturn and related drop
in demand for wood products forced the Collins Companies—a
fifth-generation, family-owned enterprise and one of the
largest forest landowners in Pennsylvania—to lay off 300
people since the recession started in 2007.
“We’re trying to stay in these
communities but it’s really tough out there. Quite frankly,
we’re losing money,” said Collins’ Senior Vice President
Wade Mosby. “If we were just intent on dollars and cents, we
would have shut some of these facilities down. But we’re
trying to keep the core employment going to maintain some of
these rural communities. In a town like Lakeview, Oregon, we
had 110 people on the payroll. Now we’re down to 68 and
that’s still the largest private employer in a town of 2,700
people.”
Hendrix and Mosby are part of a PFT-led
coalition of working lands supporters, including large and
small forest landowners, mill owners, market makers, and
conservation and environmental organizations. Coalition
members have been asking lawmakers to secure the roots of
our nation’s new “Green Economy” by ensuring climate and
energy legislation contains funding allocations for land
conservation.
“Here in the South, landowners need
these new revenue streams to help sustain our productive
open landscapes and the rural economies they support,” says
coalition member Walter Sedgwick, a family-forest owner in
Georgia. He noted that 3.6 million acres of forest, farm and
ranch land in the Southeast will be converted and developed
by 2030 according to recent USDA projections.
“Investment in forest conservation and
stewardship can be a powerful stimulus for economic recovery
and jobs while providing great climate benefits,” Wayburn
added, citing a 2007 study by the University of
Massachusetts’ PERI Institute. The study found investment in
forest conservation and restoration yields the most jobs per
dollar invested of any industry studied—including renewable
and conventional energy sources like oil and nuclear.
Economic Bedrock in the Granite State
Coalition member Jameson French is
president of New Hampshire- and Virginia-based Northland
Forest Products, Inc., which owns 10,000 acres of working
forestland. His family has been in the hardwood trade since
the 1880s. He and fellow coalition member Peter Stein, a
noted conservationist and managing director for the Lyme
Timber Company, recently wrote an opinion piece urging New
England lawmakers to remember the proud role of working
forests in their local heritage and economy for the past 150
years. In New Hampshire alone, forestry based
activities—including saw milling and paper
manufacturing—generate almost $1.2 billion in gross revenues
each year while providing more than 16,600 jobs.
In all, more than 25 percent of private
sector employment in the Granite State is dependent on
forestry, recreation, agriculture, and the natural and
working landscapes that sustain all three industries.
“These same New Hampshire landscapes
could play a key role in the shift to a low carbon,
climate-friendly economy if new incentives are provided to
encourage sustainable land management practices that capture
and store the greenhouse gas pollution responsible for
climate change,” French and Stein wrote in their editorial.
“But they can’t do that if they disappear completely, plowed
under for the next strip mall or big box store.”

Reprinted with permission of Pacific Forest Trust, from
ForestLife,
Summer 2010, Pages 4-5.
RETURN TO INDEX
Supervisor of the Month
Speaks . . .
Janine
Burns, Mathews County VA
Mathews
County, Virginia Shoreline Management Plan
Mathews County, Virginia consists of a
peninsula and an island with over 350 miles of shoreline,
including upland creeks. The County is naturally beautiful
with the largest concentrations of marsh grass on the
western shore of the Chesapeake Bay. Since the County is at
or near-sea level, erosion is a challenge. Long-time
residents tell tales, handed down through generations, of
now-gone beaches, orchards and forests. Newcomers are
typically retirees, often unfamiliar with homeownership in a
coastal community and options for protecting their land.
Aided by its location at the end of the road, a high
water table, and public policy, Mathews has escaped
extensive large-scale, commercial development. That’s
good. On the flip side, it means the County has limited
revenue options and depends on property taxes for over 90%
of its local revenue.
County government is united in
recognizing the need to improve water quality and moderate
erosion.
A recent study conducted through the
Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS), College of
William & Mary, found over 50% of U.S. east coast tidal
wetlands will disappear by 2100 if current shoreline
practices continue. Tidal wetlands can accommodate up to
2.5 millimeters of sea-level rise annually by trapping
sediments and forming peat. Unfortunately, sea level is
rising about 3.0 millimeters per year with a 5.0 to 10.0
millimeter rise anticipated in the coming decades. Under
anticipated conditions, tidal wetlands, vital for filtering
pollutants, sustaining fisheries and protecting land against
storms, could survive only by migrating landward with rising
seas. Bulkheads, riprap and like-structures prohibit
migration, essentially drowning the wetlands in place. The
VIMS study foresaw an untenable future for Mathews County
and focused attention on the need to educate coastal
homeowners about living shorelines and other alternatives to
current management practices.
In 2008, supported by a 5-0 vote of its
Board of Supervisors and led by the County Administrator,
the County offered itself to VIMS as a living laboratory
to monitor and manage the effects of rising sea levels on a
fragile ecosystem. The objective was to gather data to
supplement anecdotal beliefs and to determine best
practices for shoreline management. VIMS accepted the
offer. Since 2008, VIMS has mapped the entire shoreline.
A Shoreline Studies Program, a joint effort with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, has begun to place GPS-supported
devices on select properties to monitor sand movement for
two years. The result will be a plan for best use of
dredged sand on Mathews County beaches. Additionally, a
Shoreline Management Plan, currently in draft form, will be
published shortly.
Shoreline in Mathews County ranges from
land fronting the Chesapeake Bay to sheltered, interior
creeks. Soil type, bank height, potential for
flooding, fetch (distance over which wind can blow to create
waves), water depth, land use, severity of erosion, and
other conditions require tailored recommendations for
erosion control that are site specific. The Mathews
Shoreline Management Plan will provide property owners and
others with strategies for each section of the County’s
inhabited, eroding shoreline. Recommendations for
erosion control will incorporate information that will
preserve or create wetlands, beaches and dune habitat, all
contributing to improved water quality. A homeowner
will be able to view online site details and learn
recommendations tailored to conditions at that site by 2011.
A shoreline project will still require a
site survey, geotechnical evaluation, detailed drawing by a
qualified engineer or contractor, and permits. Ultimately,
the landowner is responsible for deciding how to manage
his/her shoreline. Because of the partnership between
Mathews County and VIMS, it is hoped the landowner’s
decision will be an informed one.
You can get more information about the
project at:
http://web.vims.edu/physical/research/shoreline/index.htm
and about Mathews County at
www.co.mathews.va.us.
RETURN TO INDEX
"Conservation Makes $ense"
The Conservation Leaders
Network at NACo

Commissioner Mike Murray, Lewis & Clark County MT, working
the
"Conservation Makes $ense" booth with Lane County OR
Commissioner Pete Sorenson.
Held in Reno NV in mid-July, the National
Association of Counties (NACo) annual conference was again
an important opportunity for the Conservation Leaders
Network to make personal contact with our many
pro-environment allies. It gives us a chance to meet
many of the county officials we've worked with over the
years, folks we've only known by phone and email.
This year's
"Conservation Makes $ense" booth co-sponsors were The Wilderness
Society and the Pew Environment
Group.
Executive
Director Peg Reagan was assisted at the booth by Lewis &
Clark County MT Commissioner Mike Murray, Calaveras County
CA Supervisor Steve Wilensky, Lane County OR Commissioner
Pete Sorenson, Mono County CA Supervisor Byng Hunt and Queen
Anne's County MD Commissioner Carol Fordonski.
The attendance at this year's
conference was way down; we heard only one-third of the
normal 4,000. Although attendance has been dropping
over the last couple of years, this year was noticeably
slower. It may have been due to the location, or
county budget woes with travel budgets being slashed or
other factors. We met only a quarter of the number of
pro-environment county officials we usually meet.
Supervisor Steve Wilensky,
Calaveras County CA, discussing
the economic benefits of natural resource
conservation.
And we know it's not that they aren't out
there, only that they didn't come to the NACo conference in
Reno. Fortunately, we expect a more robust turnout at next
year's event in Portland, OR.
You can see more photos by going to our
website at
www.conservationleaders.org/naco-10 and see the list of
materials we distributed at
www.conservationleaders.org/naco.materials-10.
We
still have copies of some of the handouts; we are happy to
share them with members so let us know if you'd like to
receive one or more.
RETURN TO INDEX
Local
Officials for Clean Water Launched!

Monday, July 19, saw the public
launch of "Local Officials for Clean Water" during the
National Association of Counties' Annual Conference in Reno
NV.
Speakers included Conservation
Leaders Network's Executive Director Peg Reagan, Marin
County CA Supervisor Susan Adams, Lane County OR
Commissioner Pete Sorenson, Queen Anne's County MD
Commissioner Carol Fordonski, and Henderson County NC
Commissioner Chuck McGrady.
See the principles of Local
Officials for Clean Water on the Conservation Leaders
Network's website at:
www.conservationleaders.org/clean.water.principles.
We are working to expand the
group. Conference calls are scheduled for the first
Monday of the month. If you are interested in joining,
contact Peg Reagan at 541 247-8079 or by email at info at
www.conservationleaders.org.
A sample
resolution in support of clean water, based on one passed in
Mathews County VA in 2009, is available for your
consideration. To see the draft resolution, go to:
www.conservationleaders.org/clean.water.resolution.
RETURN TO INDEX
Montgomery County MD:
First to Pass a Countywide Carbon Tax
By
Christopher Johnson, Editorial Assistant, National
Association of Counties
While
Congress continues arguing over climate and energy
legislation, Montgomery County, Md. passed the nation’s
first countywide carbon tax.
The
Montgomery County Council voted 8–1 on May 19 to enact a
carbon tax of $5 per ton of carbon dioxide on power stations
that produce more than 1 million tons in a given year. Under
those terms, the tax only applies to Mirant Inc., owners of
a coal-fired power plant that emits 3 million tons of carbon
dioxide annually or 25 percent of all greenhouse gas
emissions in the county.
“It is
responsible, fair, fiscally prudent and good public policy
for them to pay to clean up after themselves,” Montgomery
County Councilmember Roger Berliner said.
Berliner,
who introduced the bill, added that the $15 million this
bill will raise could help finance programs such as the Home
Energy Loan Program, which was passed in FY09 to help
finance residents’ energy-efficiency projects through
personal property taxes so the loan is tied to the property
it benefits.
Mirant says
that such taxes don’t create a level playing field among the
larger carbon consumers and that the company already pays
for its own emissions through the Regional Greenhouse Gas
Initiative, a 10-state carbon-trading auction.
After
failing to kill the measure, Mirant recently filed a lawsuit
against Montgomery County in federal district court seeking
a restraining order or injunction. The company also argues
that the tax violates the so-called dormant commerce clause,
a legally inferred corollary to the Constitution’s Commerce
Clause that limits state actions.
“Mirant
faces the choice of paying during the litigation or not and
face a 20 percent penalty should the county prevail,”
Berliner added. “The county will obviously defend the tax in
court, and the tax liability has begun accruing.”
Permission to reprint
granted by the National Association of Counties.
RETURN TO INDEX
From
the Director . . .
I am always
glad to get back home after the National Association of
Counties annual conferences. We've been attending
since 1998, bringing our "Conservation Makes $ense" booth
and materials that show that protecting and restoring
America's natural resources makes good economic sense.
Earlier in this newsletter as well as on our website, you've
been able to see a list of this year's materials, photos of
county officials working the booth and information about the
public launch of "Local Officials for Clean Water."
In addition
to our work at the National Association of Counties and on
clean water, the Conservation Leaders Network has been
working on member recruitment and other much-needed capacity
building. Lane County Commissioner Pete Sorenson, a
member of the Conservation Leaders Network's Board of
Directors, recently sent out a letter to more than 500
county officials across the country encouraging them to join
the Conservation Leaders Network. Next month, Board
Chair Commissioner Barry Jacobs, of Orange County NC, will
be writing to our former members inviting them to rejoin us.
I hope you will take a few moments and encourage your
pro-environment county officials to join, too.
We need your help to remain strong. If we want to grow
and take on more natural resource issues of interest to you,
we need to expand our membership. Our staff and board
is working hard at it and I hope to have tangible results to
show for all that effort.
I mentioned other much-needed
capacity building in the prior paragraph. Most members
know that I was a county commissioner from a rural county in
the early 90s. What you might not know was that I knew
nothing about forming a non-profit organization; I didn't
even know how to use a computer! Every step of the way
has been a learning process--first how to write grant
proposals, how to engage an active and effective Board of
Directors, then how to get tax-exempt status, then how to
become a membership organization and how to recruit and
retain members, i.e. how to provide services to members, such as
our newsletter, our website, our "$$ for Counties" email
funding opportunities service. Now we have to work on
attracting major donor contributions, becoming more
effective at grant writing and learning better how to
measure the effectiveness of our work. That's all in
addition to our project work--the stuff the foundations want
to fund us to do. If you have suggestions for how we
might improve--whether it's services to members, specific
issues you'd like to see us engaged in, or other ideas--or
you'd be willing to offer your time, talents and support to
us, I would love to hear from you!

RETURN TO INDEX
Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Local Climate and Energy Program
Clean energy strategies help
local governments achieve important environmental and
economic objectives, including:
-
Reducing emissions of air
pollutants and greenhouse gases,
-
Lowering energy costs,
-
Improving energy reliability
and security,
-
Increasing local economic
development,
-
Meeting sustainability and
green building goals, and
-
Improving public health and
quality of life.
The Local Climate and Energy
Program is an informational resource network designed to:
-
Assist local governments in
their efforts to invest in and promote clean energy
strategies to advance their priorities, and
-
Provide opportunities to
showcase leadership by local governments.
What is EPA doing to assist
Local Governments? EPA offers or is developing resources to
aid and recognize local government action:
-
Comprehensive database of
planning, policy, technical, analytical, and information
resources for municipalities,
-
Easy access to a set of clean
energy programs and resources that EPA offers to assist
local governments.
-
Free monthly clean energy
webcasts featuring EPA staff and local government
practitioners
-
A Municipal Clean Energy Best
Practices Guidebook, and
-
Case studies on the clean
energy actions of local government to help others
replicate successes.
Clean Energy Savings Potential
EPA estimates that state and
local cost-effective clean energy policies could cut the
expected growth in electricity demand in half by 2025, and
meet additional demand through cleaner energy supply.
This would prevent the need for 300 power plants, and save
over 900 billion kWh or $70 billion in energy bills. It
would also avoid the greenhouse gas emissions equivalent
to those of 80 million vehicles annually by 2025.
What is Clean Energy?
Clean energy includes demand-
and supply-side resources that offer clean, reliable, and
low cost ways to meet our growing energy demand. Energy
efficiency measures reduce demand for energy generation,
which reduces the amount of fuel needed to power our daily
lives. Renewable energy sources avoid the use of fossil
fuels, and combined heat and power can provide much greater
energy output for the amount of fuel used. Transportation
clean energy strategies include fuel-efficient technologies,
renewable fuels and other transportation options that reduce
energy demand.
What can local Governments do?
Local governments can tap into
the Climate and Energy Local Network, a publicly accessible
information sharing resource. Municipalities can use the
Network to:
-
Access tools and resources
designed to help inform clean energy policy decisions,
-
See what clean energy policies
are being used by other local governments,
-
Determine whether to formally
join one or more of EPA’s Partnership Programs that
support clean energy best practices and take advantage of
additional resources available to partners.
For more Information:
http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy-programs/state-and-local/local.html
U.S. EPA Clean Energy Programs
for Local Governments
Energy Star
Energy Star brings government
agencies, school systems, and private building owners and
managers a proven energy management strategy to save energy
and money while demonstrating environmental leadership.
Resources include: tools for tracking buildings’ energy
use, online trainings, communications kits, financing
information, and case studies. Local governments and school
systems can become Energy Star partners, apply for the
Energy Star label for high performing buildings, take on the
Energy Star Challenge to improve energy efficiency by 10% or
more and bring the Energy Star Challenge to others in their
community. Visit:
http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=leaders.bus_challenge
for details.
Green Power Partnership
Green Power is an
environmentally friendly electricity product that is
generated from renewable energy sources. Buying green power
is easy, and it can offer a number of environmental and
economic benefits over conventional electricity. The USEPA
Green Power Partnership assists local governments that are
buying or planning to buy green power. The EPA offers
credible benchmarks for green power purchases, market
information, and opportunities for recognition and promotion
of leading purchasers. Visit:
http://epa.gov/greenpower/index.htm for details.
Combined Heat and Power
Combined Heat and Power (CHP) is
an efficient, clean, and reliable approach to generating
power and thermal energy from a single fuel source. The CHP
Partnership is a voluntary program that seeks to reduce the
environmental impact of power generation by promoting the
use of CHP. The Partnership can assist local governments in
evaluating and implementing new projects and promoting their
energy, environmental, and economic benefits. See:
http://epa.gov/chp/ for
details.
Landfill Methane Outreach
Program
Landfill gas is the natural
by-product of landfills that can be captured and used as an
energy resource with air quality and greenhouse gas
benefits. The U.S. EPA’s Landfill Methane Outreach Program
(LMOP) is a voluntary assistance program that helps to
reduce methane emissions from landfills by encouraging the
recovery and use of landfill gas. LMOP offers technical
assistance, guidance materials, software tools, and
assistance creating partnerships and finding financing for
projects. Visit:
http://epa.gov/lmop/ for details.
Heat Island Reduction Initiative
Heat Islands describe urban air
and surface temperatures that are higher than nearby rural
areas. EPA’s Heat Island Reduction Initiative offers
outreach materials, tools, and guidance that provides
communities with information to develop projects, programs,
and policies to implement strategies that reduce heat
islands and save energy. Visit:
http://epa.gov/hiri/index.html for details.
Office of Transportation and Air
Quality: State and Local Resources website offers useful
information, tools, and resources to help local governments
achieve their air quality and transportation objectives.
Visit:
http://epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/index.htm for
details.
SmartWay Transport Partnership
is a collaborative voluntary program between EPA and the
freight industry to increase the energy efficiency and
energy security of our country while significantly reducing
air pollution and greenhouse gases. See:
http://epa.gov/smartway
for details.
SmartWay Grow and Go is a
program developed by EPA to promote the environmental
benefits of renewable fuels and is a renewable fuel
component for EPA’s existing SmartWay Transport
Partnership. See:
http://epa.gov/smartway/growandgo for details.
The National Clean Diesel
Campaign is a collection of successful voluntary programs
all designed to reduce emissions from the diesel fleet.
Visit:
http://epa.gov/cleandiesel for details.
Best Workplaces for Commuters is
a business/governments voluntary initiative offering
innovative solutions to commuting challenges faced by
employers and employees. See:
http://www.bestworkplacesforcommuters.gov/ for details.
EPA’s Green Vehicle Guide is a
consumer-oriented web site providing information about the
environmental performance of cars and light trucks.
Visit:
http://epa.gov/greenvehicles for details.
Reprinted from EPA material.
RETURN TO INDEX
Public
Health and Safety Benefits of Wetlands

Wetlands act as natural
sponges and barriers that protect communities from severe
storms, hurricanes, flooding, drought and harmful water
pollutants.
The porous soils and
plants of wetlands buffer communities from hurricanes and
store vast quantities of runoff water during floods.
Coastal wetlands serve as the first line of defense against
coastal storms and hurricanes. Communities buffered by
wetlands incurred significantly less damage during Hurricane
Katrina than communities without this natural defense.
Wetlands in the interior of the U.S. also protect
communities against natural disasters. The loss of wetlands
in the Midwest greatly increased the damage caused by The
Great Flood of 1993. Many communities in the Midwest are
working together to protect their citizens by restoring the
region’s wetlands and their natural role as floodplains.
The slow release of
water from wetlands is also critical to water safety and
quantity. Wetlands release water slowly to rivers and
streams as floods recede. This gradual process allows
suspended sediments to drop out and settle to the wetlands
floor. In many cases, wetland plants remove much of the
excess nutrient and pollutant loads from waters that pass
through a wetland. The storage and slow release of runoff
water by wetlands also helps to prevent erosion in
downstream channels, and stabilizes the flow in streams and
rivers. Protecting wetlands may greatly reduce, or even
eliminate, the need for expensive structural flood
controls. In times of drought, wetlands help keep streams
flowing by releasing stored groundwater.
County Spotlight –
Orange County, Florida
This coastal county is
one of seven counties recognized as comprising Central
Florida. Orange County is a charter county, meaning it has
its own constitution and is self-governing. Its 907 square
miles include the city of Orlando, and in 2000, the
population was slightly over 890,000 people making it a
growing urban county.
Orange County, Florida
is an area that has experienced rapid development and is
particularly susceptible to flooding due to its low-lying
elevation, heavy precipitation, number of slow- moving
waterways and the threat of hurricanes. The county has made
a serious education and outreach effort to the public for
the last twenty years detailing the importance of wetlands
conservation and stormwater management in effectively
preventing flooding. Orange County’s Office of Emergency
Management works in conjunction with local water management
districts to conduct hazard area identification and mapping
as well as to promote community involvement in floodplain
management activities. The county has also utilized tools
such as mitigation banking to ensure that a sufficient
amount of wetlands and other natural resources remain to
protect against coastal waves and wind.
Did you know ?
An acre of wetland can store 1-1.5 million gallons of
floodwater.
To learn more about
Orange County, Florida’s flood prevention efforts using
wetlands go to
www.orangecountyfl.net/cms/DEPT/pw/stormwater/default.htm.
More information about
mitigation banking can be found of the EPA’s website. Go to
www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/facts/fact16.html.
Reprinted with permission, National Association of Counties.
RETURN TO INDEX
Biobased Products Help
Protect Yellowstone
Yellowstone
National Park celebrated its 125th anniversary in 1997 and
the question arose about what could be done to protect
America’s first national park for the next 125 years. The
use of biodiesel fuel and other environmental activities
laid an excellent foundation for an overarching effort that
is now called “The Greening of Yellowstone.”
Environmental Protection
Specialist Jim Evanoff takes his job seriously. “When you
work at Yellowstone National Park, it is incumbent upon you
to do everything you can to be innovative in protecting the
Park’s sensitive environment,” he says.
Evanoff and the Park’s
best known efforts regarding biobased products center on
their early use of biodiesel. In addition, they are early
adopters and proactive advocates for a number of other
products including using:
-
Uses only biobased
cleaning/janitorial products—over 700 gallons in 2007.
-
Biobased hydraulic
fluids used in many applications throughout its extensive
fleet operations.
-
Biobased two-stroke
lubricating oils in chain saws, lawn mowers and other
equipment.
-
All of the Park-owned
diesel engines, ranging from trucks to generators to snow
trail groomers, powered by B20 (20 percent biodiesel and
80 percent diesel). The Park’s use of B20 displaces more
than 25,000 gallons of petroleum diesel every year.
Annually, it also prevents more than500 metric tons of
carbon dioxide from entering into Yellowstone's
atmosphere.
-
Concessions operations
in Yellowstone use only biodiesel blends in all diesel
applications as well as print with soy ink.
-
Biodiesel is available
to the public at four pumps in three states (Idaho,
Montana and Wyoming) that straddle Yellowstone’s ecosystem
to aid tourists in protecting the Park.
During a conversation
with Evanoff, it usually returns to his favorite topic,
biodiesel. That’s only natural because each year, as he
explains it, the Park has more than three million visitors
and virtually every one of them arrives by automobile or
bus. Beyond that, Yellowstone itself has a fleet of more
than 700 vehicles. It is no wonder that Jim’s first
environmental concern centers around vehicular
transportation, and biodiesel fuel, in particular.
“I first became aware of
biodiesel in 1995 through a proposed demonstration project
with the University of Idaho, State of Montana, the
Department of Energy and a myriad of private entities” he
explains. “It just seemed like something we should
investigate and try.”
Out of that early
interest grew Jim’s idea to run the now famous diesel pickup
truck on B100 (100% biodiesel). As an integral part of the
project, Dodge Truck, Inc. donated the new truck. In 2008,
Jim continues to operate the truck that currently has
195,000 miles and still using B100—all year round in
sometimes harsh weather/temperature conditions. The truck
became a symbol for the use of biodiesel not only in
Yellowstone, but also in other facilities as Jim spread the
biodiesel/biobased message. “Over the years I’ve given
dozens of presentations on the environmental advantages of
using biodiesel, not only in the Park system but to other
entities as well,” he says.
Jim still enjoys telling
the story about one of the beneficial effects of biodiesel—the
elimination of the well known diesel fuel exhaust odor. When
operated on B100, vehicles produce a fume aroma that smells
much like that of cooking French fries. “There became
concern that this smell might attract some of the park’s
grizzly bears. To ensure that the truck was not a bear
attractant, it was driven to Washington State University
where tests were conducted with captive bears that were
being used for research. Eventually it was concluded that
the bears exhibited minimal attraction to the exhaust
fumes,” he says.
Also,
the Park has revived an old tradition from the 1930s and
40s—a renovated fleet of famous 16-passenger “old yellow
buses” that moves visitors on winding and narrow roads to
major attractions throughout the Park. Additionally, six
replicas of the old buses are powered by biodiesel. These
replicas can be converted from wheels to tracks so they can
be operated during the winter season. The seven original old
yellow buses that have been restored are powered by an
ethanol-blended fuel.
“These buses have
several purposes,” explains Jim. “They reduce congestion and
obviously cut down fuel consumption and exhaust fumes, but
they also are a way of bringing biobased fuel to the
attention of visitors.
“We have the world’s largest concentration
of geo-thermal features, and they present a unique
environmental challenge. Just think, during the summer
10, 000 tourists a day, most of them driving their own
automobiles, visit Old Faithful alone. As stewards of the
world’s first national park, we continually strive do
everything possible to preserve and protect all of the
natural resources we have here at Yellowstone.”
Reprinted with permission of the US Soybean Board, which
is composed of 68 U.S. soybean farmers appointed by the
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture to invest soybean checkoff
funds.
CLN Volunteer Appreciation
Lunch

The Conservation Leaders Network's Volunteer
Appreciation Lunch was held in June. Present were
Karim Shumaker, former CLN staff, Kay Jenson--the one with
the beautiful handwriting you might see on some CLN
envelopes, Mary Spini, Office Assistant, Peg Reagan,
Executive Director, Laura Greathead, our trusty
proof-reader, and Jan Short, our new Administrative
Assistant.
Not present were Yekaterina Ageyeva, who is
designing our new website, Suzanne Ankrum, Laurie Brand,
Morgan Covington, Deborah Lieberman, Ben Pearlman, Evelyn
Reagan, Elaine Smithand the county officials who
worked our "Conservation Makes $ense" booth in Reno NV:
Lewis & Clark County MT Commissioner Mike Murray, Calaveras
County CA Supervisor Steve Wilensky, Lane
County OR Commissioner Pete Sorenson, Mono County CA
Supervisor Byng Hunt and Queen Anne's County MD Commissioner
Carol Fordonski.
We really appreciate all they give to the
Conservation Leaders Network!
RETURN TO INDEX
YES!
I
want to join the Conservation Leaders Network, the only
nonprofit organization in the country which focuses on
working with county commissioners to protect America’s
natural resources.
Individual and county memberships are now available.
Individual memberships start at $45/year; county
memberships start at $250/yr. Counties with more
than 5 commissioners may inquire about rates.
With my membership, I will get:
-
$$
for Counties, email notice of protection and restoration
funding opportunities for counties
-
priority access to the Conservation Leaders staff for
information and support
-
“Networker,” the Conservation Leaders Network’s
quarterly newsletter
Name:____________________________________________________
Address:__________________________________________________
City:_____________________________________________________
State:_________Zip
code:___________
Phone:_______________________Fax:_________________________
Email
address:_____________________________________________
Please make your check payable to the:
Conservation Leaders Network
PO Box 46
Wedderburn, OR 97491
If you wish to unsubscribe from
the newsletter, please email us with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line.
Home
Join The Conservation Leaders Network!
TOP OF PAGE
PO Box 46,
Wedderburn OR 97491
541.247.8079 (phone)
541.247.9521 (fax)
info at conservationleaders dot org
The Conservation Leaders Network is a
non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization as determined by the
Internal Revenue Service
Please note:
This site provides links to other organizations for informational
purposes only.
The Conservation Leaders Network has not reviewed and disclaims all
responsibility for the content of these websites.
|